
A CHF 10 cheaper but reduced default option lowered conversion by 18.6%, a clear lesson in defaults and loss aversion.
The result in one sentence
−18.6% conversion: a cheaper, stripped-back default performed worse.
Conversion Optimiser, UX Strategist, Test Manager, Hands-on Implementation
Content Manager / Publisher · UX/UI Designer
The more expensive option was preselected and nobody knew whether that helped or hurt.
Phone CH with a landline flat rate was the default in the tariff setup.
A large share of users never change the default, so the preselection actively shapes the decision.
Cheaper means more attractive, therefore more sales.
What happens when the default suddenly gives customers less?
A cheaper standard option would increase conversion.
The reduced service level would be perceived as a loss.
Losses weigh more heavily than equivalent gains, the principle of loss aversion.
An A/B test with different defaults in the tariff setup.
Phone CH with landline flat rate preselected at the higher price.
Phone without flat rate preselected, CHF 10 cheaper.
New customers on Connect 40 tariffs.
The more expensive default won despite the CHF 10 premium.
Version A with Phone CH preselected performed clearly better.
Cheaper Phone default: −18.6% conversion, 92% significance.
Phone CH selected: −56.7%
+120.6%
−46.1%, 98% significance
When the stronger option is removed from the default, many people choose no add-on at all. Fear of losing value outweighs the incentive to save CHF 10.


What I take away from it
A cheaper option does not persuade if it comes with visibly less value.
It defines what feels normal, so moving away from it can feel like giving something up.
I now test preselection systematically before focusing on layout changes.
+86.45% click-through rate from a single ‘New’ label, at 100% significance.

From zero to a complete brand and website in roughly two weeks of focused work.

A broad craft offering translated into two clear paths and built into a complete digital brand.