
Trying to streamline redundant information on a mobile tariff overview reduced conversion by 35.1% at 99.88% significance. Customers no longer felt fully informed.
The result in one sentence
−35.1% conversion. An over-simplified mobile tariff page felt opaque instead of clear.
Conversion Optimiser, UX Strategist, Test Manager, Hands-on Implementation
Content Manager / Publisher · UX/UI Designer
The mobile product overview was detailed and visually overloaded.
Three-column layout with packshots, product names and repeated service information.
High information density was making quick decisions harder on small screens.
Simplify by reducing repetition and creating a clearer visual structure.
At what point does simplification turn into uncertainty?
Less visual complexity and condensed tariff information would increase comprehension and conversion.
Reduction could not come at the cost of knowing which services belonged to which tariff.
The new layout visually separated tariff elements such as data from calls and SMS.
An A/B test with a minimalist presentation.
Original view with full information and visually separated services.
No product images or titles, with data volume and price made prominent.
Explanatory copy beneath the tariff details.
−35.1%
99.88%
Users could no longer tell whether calls and SMS were included.
The reduction was interpreted as a lack of transparency rather than simplification.


What I take away from it
Some repetition confirms an assumption instead of merely taking up space.
For mobile products, expectations around completeness are especially high.
I now reduce only when the relationship between services becomes clearer, not weaker.
−18.6% conversion: a cheaper, stripped-back default performed worse.
+86.45% click-through rate from a single ‘New’ label, at 100% significance.

From zero to a complete brand and website in roughly two weeks of focused work.